Cell Salvage Transfusion Therapy for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Traumatic Pelvic and Acetabulum Fractures: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objectives: To evaluate the benefits of Cell Salvage (CS) therapy in patients with traumatic pelvis and/or acetabulum fractures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Data collected from medical records and radiographs. Setting: Level-1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: 157 patients with traumatic pelvis and/or acetabulum fractures treated operatively under the care of one surgeon between 2008 and 2012 were included. Exclusion criteria included nonsurgical patients and those treated with percutaneous fixation. Intervention: All patients underwent open reduction internal fixation of their pelvis and/or acetabulum fractures. The use of cell salvage therapy was randomly selected for trauma patients based on the availability of the system. Main Outcome Measurements: Volume of allogeneic blood transfused (ABT), estimated blood loss (EBL), hemoglobin (Hb) levels preoperatively and postoperatively, and blood-related costs to the patient. Results: CS was used in 89 cases (56.7%) with an average volume of 86 mL. There was a significantly higher ABT in the CS group than the no CS group (625 vs. 376 mL, p < 0.05) however this difference disappeared when controlling for blood loss with the ABT/EBL ratio (1.08 vs. 0.74, p = 0.10). Cell saver showed some benefit in patients with high blood loss (> 500 mL) in which case there was a significantly higher volume of salvaged blood than patients with low blood loss (162 vs. 27 mL, p < 0.05), and in patients with > 7 days to surgery (135 vs. 64 mL, p < 0.05). The cost difference of $1,375 was seen between the two groups, favoring the No CS group. Conclusions: Our results suggest limited overall benefit to the use of CS in patients treated with ORIF for traumatic pelvis and acetabulum fractures. Journal of Nature and Science, 1(5):e99, 2015
منابع مشابه
Clinical Results of Percutaneous Fixation of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation Technique
Background: The pelvic ring fractures (PRF) and acetabular fractures (AF) are among the major orthopedic injuriesassociated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Open surgical stabilization is the standard treatment for themajority of these complications. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgical stabilization of the fractures has become anaccepted treatment method for th...
متن کاملThe functional outcome of surgically treated unstable pelvic ring fractures by open reduction, internal fixation
Abstract Background: Unstable Pelvic fracture, a result of high energy antero-posterior compression injury, has been managed based on internal fixation and open reduction. The mode of fixation in Unstable Pelvic fracture has, however, been a subject of controversy and some authors have proposed a need to address the issue of partial breach of the pelvic ring elements in these injuries. This st...
متن کاملSimultaneous Periprosthetic Acetabular Fracture and Contralateral B-Type Compression Injury of the Pelvic Ring: A Case Report of a Rare Injury Combination
The periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum is a rare injury, and its management is only sporadically reported in the literature. A few case reports are available which mainly focus on periprosthetic acetabular fractures in the elderly population. In our case, a 32-year-old patient suffered from a periprosthetic acetabular fracture in combination with a pelvic ring injury following a high vel...
متن کاملLong-term Results, Functional Outcomes and Complications after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Neglected and Displaced Greater Tuberosity of Humerus Fractures
Background: Humerus fractures include 5% to 8% of total fractures. Non-union and delayed union of GT (GT) fractures is uncommon; however they present a challenge to the orthopedic surgeons. Significant controversy surrounds optimal treatment of neglected fractures. The purpose of this article was to perform a comparative study to evaluate the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixatio...
متن کاملThe Best Option in Treatment of Modified Mason Type III Radial Head Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Radial Head Excision
Background: Radial head fractures commonly occur during elbow traumas. Among those, treatment of Mason type IIIfractures is still under controversy. Common treatment methods for these fractures include open reduction and internalfixation (ORIF) as well as radial head excision. In this study, we compared long-term outcomes of both methods intreatment of patients with Mason type III fractures of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015